Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Demand for foreign workers 'still strong'

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 31 August 2010.

Demand for foreign workers 'still strong'
By Kor Kian Beng & Chong Zi Liang
Straits Times, Aug 31, 2010

Photo caption: Contractors, manufacturers and SMEs The Straits Times spoke to said they still had projects lined up for the next few months and would not slow down their hiring of foreign workers just yet. -- ST PHOTO: SAMUEL HE

THE economy is projected to slow down in the months ahead but many employers are not slowing their hiring of foreign workers.

Business is good, so contractors, manufacturers, and small and medium-sized enterprises that rely heavily on foreign workers told The Straits Times yesterday that they are puzzled by the Government's forecast that the inflow will slow to around 80,000 this year.

The figure had been announced by Prime Minster Lee Hsien Loong the previous day at the annual National Day Rally.

It is a downward revision of the 100,000 estimate he had announced last month when he spoke of the need to let them in as the economy sizzles and demand for workers soars.

But the new figure, which is about half the number that flooded Singapore in 2007 and 2008, is not causing employers to loose sleep. The reason: It is not a cap on supply but a forecast of a flow that is determined by market forces.

Said Mr Teo Siong Seng, president of the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry: 'It (the 80,000) could be a ballpark figure in view of a projected slowdown in the last quarter of this year, owing to the shaky recovery in the United States and euro zone debt problems.'

His response is typical of most of the eight employers and business groups interviewed yesterday.

But construction has projects lined up till the end of a 'favourable' year, so demand for foreign workers will remain strong, said Singapore Contractors Association president Andrew Khng.

The sector hires about 245,000 of the more than one million foreigners in Singapore's workforce of about three million.

However, companies like Jason Parquet, a timber-flooring company, are holding back, wary of the higher foreign worker levies in the pipeline.

Said owner Jason Sim, 44: 'I have frozen hiring this year and I don't intend to renew the contracts of the foreign workers due to uncertainty in the economy.'

Of his 260 employees, 220 are foreigners.

Higher levies are inevitable, PM Lee had warned on Sunday, saying 'it is necessary because we need to manage the inflow and not have an indefinite number'.

The foreign worker levy system was already tightened last month, with a tiered system of increasingly higher rates that make it very costly to hire plentiful foreigners, especially low-skilled ones.

The higher rates are part of a national drive to raise productivity growth to 2 to 3 per cent yearly over the next decade.

Labour economist Hui Weng Tat believes an expected rise in productivity is probably an underlying reason for the Government's confidence that the economy can do with fewer foreign workers.

PM Lee, in revising his figure, did not give any reason, saying only that 'we've recalculated; maybe we'll get by with a few less, perhaps 80,000 workers.'

When contacted, the Manpower Ministry said it 'takes into consideration the global and regional economic outlook, as well as Singapore's 2010 economic growth projection and labour market conditions, to give a broad estimate of the possible growth of the foreign workforce this year'.

Mr Lawrence Leow, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises, feels the new estimate will likely be realised. The slowing economy coupled with higher foreign worker levies will make companies more cautious in hiring foreigners so that they 'won't be caught over-stretched', he said.

Monday, August 30, 2010

Foreign worker levy could rise further in long term

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 30 August 2010.

Foreign worker levy could rise further in long term
Straits Times, Aug 30, 2010

Photo caption: PM Lee has said there cannot be an 'indefinite number' of foreign workers and the flow has to be managed. -- PHOTO: THE NEW PAPER

PRIME Minister Lee Hsien Loong hinted last night during the National Day Rally that the foreign worker levy - what employers must pay to hire a foreigner instead of a local - will likely be raised even further in the long term.

His phrasing suggested the increase will go beyond the hike currently planned, which takes full effect only in July 2012. Noting that the Government does not allow foreigners to 'come in uncontrolled', he said: 'The levies are going up. They are going to go up further and I think they have to go up further beyond that, in the longer term. Or maybe the not-so-long term.'

He added: 'I think some employers may feel the pinch. But it is necessary because we need to manage the inflow and not have an indefinite number.'

This year's Budget unveiled the plan to raise levies, in varying amounts for different categories, every six months, starting in July. An employer must also pay a higher levy for an additional foreign hire if it already has a large base of foreign workers.

RACHEL CHANG

Why S'pore still needs foreign talent

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 30 August 2010.

Why S'pore still needs foreign talent
But Govt is taking steps to slow inflow so locals have time to adjust
By Cassandra Chew
Straits Times, Aug 30, 2010

ST PHOTO: DESMOND LIM

WHEN SBS Transit bus captain Zhao Xiaodong, a native of Dalian in China's Liaoning province, was away from work for a week, her regular passengers grew concerned.

Several of them wrote to the company to ask what had happened to her.

They described the 38-year-old as a polite and caring driver who was considerate to pregnant women and the elderly.

And they wanted her back on her usual Service 109 route.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong highlighted Ms Zhao as a foreigner who has managed to forge personal ties with Singaporeans. He urged both newcomers and citizens to help immigrants settle in.

Mr Lee outlined three key reasons why it is important for Singapore to keep its doors open to foreigners: to gain talent, grow the economy, and make up for the population shortfall.

He also reassured Singaporeans that the Government was taking steps to slow the inflow of foreigners.

He acknowledged that the Government had accepted a larger inflow of foreign workers, permanent residents and new citizens in the last five years.

'Now I think we should consolidate, slow down the pace. We can't continue going like this and increasing our population 100,000 to 150,000 a year, indefinitely.

'And we should give Singaporeans time to adjust and our society time to settle, and integrate better the new arrivals,' he said.

Turning to why Singapore could not afford to close itself to foreigners, Mr Lee said talent was critical in helping the Republic become an outstanding city.

'We have very good people, but never enough,' he said.

One example of foreign talent benefiting ordinary Singaporeans in a concrete way is the husband-and-wife team who designed local landmark Pinnacle@Duxton, an award-winning public housing project.

They are Malaysia-born architects Khoo Peng Beng, 42, a Singapore permanent resident, and Belinda Huang, 43, now a Singapore citizen.

Another example is in the sports fraternity, which is grooming local talent, some of whom are near the top in sports like bowling and sailing. But in other sports, there will still be a need to draw on new citizens, said Mr Lee, referring to China- born table tennis players such as Li Jiawei, 28, and world No. 2 Feng Tianwei, 23.

The women's table tennis team clinched a silver medal at the Beijing Olympics in 2008, and beat China to win gold at the World Team Table Tennis Championship in Moscow in June.

He expressed his hope that Singaporeans would cheer for them as they did for all their national sportsmen.

Singapore also needs foreigners to grow the economy and create jobs for locals.

Shipyards Keppel FELS and SembCorp Marine, for example, hire 20,000 people here in total, including 5,000 Singaporeans.

But without the foreign workers, these Singaporean jobs would not exist, and vice-versa, he added.

Mr Lee pointed out that the skills, experience and knowledge that foreign workers and professionals bring with them have also helped the two firms become 'world beaters'.

Foreigners are also needed to top up the shortfall of babies, as government efforts to encourage more births of Singaporean babies have not yet yielded results.

But Mr Lee was careful to draw a distinction between foreign workers, who are transient, and immigrants, meaning PRs and new citizens.

The Government's long-term aim is to raise productivity and thereby reduce the country's reliance on foreign workers.

But, in the meantime, he asked for Singaporeans' patience with the larger number of foreign workers who are here for construction projects such as MRT lines and HDB flats.

He also assured Singaporeans that the numbers for immigrants are much smaller, and those who settle here are required not only to contribute to the economy, but also to integrate and put down roots.

~~~

'Talent makes a tremendous difference for us, for doing critical work in our economy and helping Singapore be an outstanding city.'

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on how foreign talent is good for the economy, for example, by helping shipyards like Keppel FELS become 'world beaters'

Immigrants can spur us to do better

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 30 August 2010.

Immigrants can spur us to do better
By Elgin Toh
Straits Times, Aug 30, 2010

HAVING children of immigrants study in schools here is the most effective way to help them integrate into Singapore society.

The competition they bring, moreover, will better prepare young Singaporeans for the more ruthless competition awaiting them on the global stage, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday.

He made these points in his Mandarin speech at the National Day Rally, when explaining Singapore's immigration policy.

Still, Mr Lee assured Singaporeans that even with the children of new immigrants in schools, there would be sufficient places for everyone - and Singaporeans would continue to have twice as many chances as permanent residents for the Primary One balloting exercise.

His remarks on immigration, which took up half the speech, aimed to ease anxieties among Singaporeans about the number of new citizens and PRs here.

They also came three months after Senior Minister of State (Home Affairs) Ho Peng Kee produced figures in Parliament which showed a significant slowdown in the number of new PRs and citizens.

Mr Lee said he understood Singaporeans' sense of insecurity.

Citing a recent interview he had with a reporter from an Asean country, he said that when asked why Singapore would not accept more immigrants, he replied that if just 1per cent of Asean's combined population were free to move here, 'we would be finished'.

But noting that larger nations succeeded as they were like 'oceans absorbing a hundred rivers' - a Chinese idiom about the benefits of openness - he said a country like Singapore with a low-birth rate would, all the more, need to stay open.

A welcome policy towards foreign talent made Singapore more competitive internationally, he argued.

For the Chinese community in particular, new immigrants from mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan contributed to Singapore's culture and education by becoming Chinese teachers and boosting the ranks of the 'cultural elite'.

He cited a book that moved him - Chasing The Rainbow by Choo Lian Liang - which documented the struggles of four generations of the author's family which migrated here from the city of Teochew in Guangdong.

Reminding that Singaporeans' ancestors were also immigrants, he said: 'We should continue to welcome new immigrants with a broad heart, and let them help us build a better Singapore.'

Because of the difficult nature of moving and settling in to a new country, he also said that new immigrants tended to have a greater spirit of determination, daring and adventurism - a spirit that Singaporeans should learn from.

But he reiterated that as new immigrants had a potential impact on the character of the society, the Government brought in only those who could make a contribution and could integrate well.

On integration, he emphasised the role that clan associations could continue to play in helping immigrants settle. He noted the trend of new groups being formed by more recent arrivals - such as the the Tianjin Club, the Tian Fu Club, and Shanxi Association.

He called on new immigrants to step up efforts to interact with all the different races here, participate in community activities, and to learn basic English.

Singaporeans and new immigrants responded to his comments positively.

Said Tian Fu Club president Tony Du: 'Learning English is indeed very important for new immigrants. Our club will answer his call by organising activities to help members improve their English.'

As for competition in schools, Singaporean Beni Ong, 51, a procurement manager and father of two girls aged three and five, said: 'I agree competition is good and spurs us to perform better. But I hope schools can also hold extra classes for children of immigrants to teach them about our culture, values and habits.'

Mr Lee also spoke about foreign workers, saying they were needed to help Singapore maintain economic growth. But the Government will keep their proportion to around one-third of the total workforce.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Wait for Filipino maids drags on

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 29 August 2010.

Wait for Filipino maids drags on
Some employers kept waiting for a month; others find way around Manila govt's demands
By Irene Tham
Straits Times, Aug 29, 2010

Photo caption: Ms Minerve Jandoc, who has been working in Singapore for 11 years, is paid S$400 a month - less than the US$400 that the Philippine government is demanding for new maids. But she is happy to have a job and is not complaining. -- ST PHOTO: RAJ NADARAJAN

It's the US$400 ($540) pay. And the four days off a month.

In the past month, Filipinas trying to come to Singapore to work as maids have been held up by a standoff.

On one side is the Philippine government, which now conducts exit checks to see if Singapore-bound maids have a signed contract bearing these two conditions, among other things.

And on the other side are maid agencies in Singapore and their clients.

Would-be employers are keen to hire Filipino maids because they speak English.

But they baulk at the US$400 minimum wage and the mandatory four days off.

The reaction among the agencies is mixed: Some say they have been badly hit by the declining number of Filipino maids coming here and may even stop recruiting from the Philippines.

Others point to Singapore's labour laws, which do not stipulate minimum wages or days off for maids.

The agencies tell the maids to come here anyway, if need be as tourists first. And they tell their clients to sign the Philippine Overseas Labour Office (Polo) contract anyway, claiming it has no legal teeth in Singapore.

The Straits Times reported earlier this month that Manila had stepped up exit screening of Filipinas leaving for jobs here.

Those coming here to work as maids must produce, among other things, a standard contract that states the minimum salary and days off.

The contract, which the would-be employer must sign, has to be verified by Polo and authenticated by the embassy here.

These demands are believed to have existed for at least a year but were enforced only in the last month.

Agencies told The Sunday Times that when the rules were more lax, it took only a week to bring in a maid.

Apple Maid Agency, which specialises in Filipino and Indonesian maids, said 20 clients' applications are still 'pending'.

Another agency, HR Connections, said 14 clients have waited close to a month for their Filipino maids.

'My clients all won't sign the contract,' said Ms Suzette Legaspi Oligo, 36, an employee at Apple Maid Agency.

One client, who wanted to be known only as Mr Goh, finds the US$400 figure excessive. He said: 'You don't pay new maids so much. You still need to train them.'

Agencies said employers seldom agree to pay a new Filipino maid more than S$400. And many give them just one or two days off a month or a sum of cash in lieu.

Some maid agencies said they are fed up with the onerous application process and have stopped bringing in Filipinas for the time being.

Said a manager at Averise Employment Agency, who wanted to be known only as Leo: 'We lost half our business.'

He said his firm might stop supplying Filipino maids.

About 196,000 foreigners were working here as maids as of last December.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) does not provide a breakdown of the number of maids by nationality.

The Sunday Times understands that some agencies have advised their clients to sign the Polo contract 'just as a formality' to speed up the application process.

The maids have also been told that the only contract recognised by MOM is that drawn up by the Association of Employment Agencies (Singapore), which does not spell out the two terms in the Polo contract.

Singapore has no minimum wage policy. Also, contractual terms are a matter between workers and their employers.

Local maid agencies thus have a free hand to offer salaries consistent with what local employers will pay.

Some employers are unfazed by the brouhaha over the Polo contract.

Said Mr Jacky Xu, 26, who runs a tuition business: 'Maids who accept the local terms will look at their longer-term benefits and are unlikely to spill the beans.'

The Polo contract cannot be enforced in Singapore, said Mr John Gee, 57, president of Transient Workers Count Too.

'It really comes down to national sovereignty. Singapore has its rules,' he noted.

He said the Philippine government is probably hedging its bets, hoping that a small percentage of employers will abide by the Polo contract and thus raise the salaries of Filipino domestic workers.

An MOM spokesman said that when requirements imposed by a foreign government or embassy fall outside the local regulatory framework, 'employers will have to decide if they can meet these conditions when recruiting'.

Mr Rodolfo Sabulao, the labour attache at the Philippine embassy here, did not reply by press-time.

In a report by The Straits Times on Aug 18, he had said: 'As far as the Philippine government is concerned, leaving the Philippines as a tourist, when the intention is to work overseas, is illegal, even if they have an IPA.'

An IPA or In-Principle Approval letter or Letter of Notification from MOM allows foreign workers to enter Singapore legally.

Filipino maids in Singapore whom The Sunday Times spoke to said they prefer to work here for less than US$400, rather than remain in the Philippines with a meagre salary or, worse still, with no pay.

One such maid, Ms Minerve Jandoc, 33, is the eldest of eight siblings.

She has been working for the same employer for 11 years. Before coming to Singapore, she earned 1,900 pesos a month as a store clerk in Luzon. That amounts to S$57, based on current exchange rates. Now, she makes S$400 a month.

'It is so hard to get a job in the Philippines,' she said.

Channel levy to maids as wages

The following letter was published in the Straits Times on 29 August 2010.

Channel levy to maids as wages
Aug 29, 2010
YOUR LETTERS, Straits Times

I refer to Ms Shafiyahtun Najak's comment pertaining to the article, 'When maids moonlight on days off' last Sunday.

Her suggestion that looking at fair wages should be the concern seems viable, sensible and acceptable. However, it would be another harsh move if the employers, who already are burdened with high recruitment fees, are made to pay extra wages simply to keep the maids from moonlighting. Moonlighting is in violation of the terms set out in the work permit, and for it to be carried out so blatantly is even more surprising.

The ideal solution would be for the levy, which still comes out of the employer's pocket, to be channelled to the maid as wages.

Thus, curbing the maid population (one of the reasons for implementing the levy system), putting an end to their low-wage grouses and keeping at bay other problems arising from this illegal practice can be relatively managed with just this one master stroke.

Padmini Kesavapany (Mrs)

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Street fight at living quarters

The following article was published in the New Paper on 28 August 2010 and is available at AsiaOne News.

Street fight at living quarters
Sat, Aug 28, 2010
The New Paper


He was unwilling to let a fellow worker use a piece of machinery at their workplace. And that resulted in a street fight between almost 40 Bangladeshi and Myanmar nationals on Monday night.

Mr Gewel Shalam, 27, a Bangladeshi national, said that the machine was used for stamping metal sheets and was under his care.

Mr Gewel, a storeman, explained why he refused to let his fellow worker use it: "I was afraid they would spoil it and I would then be held responsible."

He added: "Later, a colleague warned me that the Myanmar workers may be unhappy with me."

Later that day, after their work at a shipyard in Tuas, Mr Gewel and the other workers - mainly Bangladeshi and Myanmar nationals - boarded the bus provided by their company to return to their quarters at Marine Road, off Lavender Street.

There were about 40 people on the bus at the time. The workers are all employed by the same company in Tuas.

Punches on bus

Their Bangladeshi supervisor, who did not want to be named and who acted as Mr Gewel's interpreter, said: "On the way back to the quarters, some Myanmar and Bangladeshi workers traded punches, but I soon calmed them down and told them to stop. All was then peaceful on the way back."

At about 8pm, the bus stopped to drop off the workers. It stopped at an open space at the junction of Petain Road and Marne Road, between a block of studio apartments and a row of terrace houses.

Mr Gewel said: "The Myanmar workers got off the bus, followed by the Bangladeshi workers.

Suddenly, the Myanmar workers grabbed some wooden poles and metal rods from the surrounding area and used them to hit the Bangladeshi workers.

"They hit me and two other Bangladeshi workers on our heads, arms and backs."

He said about 17 Myanmar workers attacked nearly 20 Bangladeshi workers in a fight that lasted several minutes.

A witness told Shin Min Daily News that he saw the men wielding 1m-long wooden sticks and metal rods.

He said: "At first, the workers were just staring at one another, but then they later charged at each other. I became scared and called the police."

Mr Gewel said police cars and an ambulance later arrived.

A police spokesman said they were informed of the fight at 8.20pm on Monday. Twelve men, aged between 23 and 32 years old, were arrested for rioting.

Mr Gewel said that he and two other Bangladeshi nationals were injured on their heads, arms and backs.

"We were taken to Tan Tock Seng Hospital, treated for our injuries and later discharged. I was given three days of medical leave."

The supervisor said the police cars stayed in the area until about 11pm.

Mr Gewel said the other victims were resting in their quarters, a two-storey terrace house.

He said he and the other two victims had worked in Singapore for less than a year. He said the Myanmar nationals had worked here for a year or more.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Foreign worker housing woes hit firms - Costs up, productivity down

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 27 August 2010.

FOREIGN WORKER HOUSING WOES HIT FIRMS
Costs Up, Productivity Down
- Higher rental and shortage of foreign worker housing
- Locations too far away, leading to higher transport costs and lost man hours

By Melissa Kok & Ng Kai Ling
Straits Times, Aug 27, 2010

Photo caption: The Murai dormitory for foreign workers beside the Choa Chu Kang Muslim cemetery. Dorms that are not full are in far-flung locations. -- ST FILE PHOTO

ACCOMMODATION woes are hitting bosses who employ foreign workers hard, forcing them to pay more for housing, and affecting productivity.

Several firms contacted say jacked-up rents at some dormitories are at the root of the problem.

A general lack of space is also causing headaches: Of the 35 commercially run dormitories for foreign workers listed on the Ministry of Manpower website, 30 were fully occupied as of Aug 1.

A spokesman for a company that has worked on major commercial and HDB projects, who declined to be named, said the firm has had to split up workers working at the same construction site into various dormitories as there is not enough room to house them together. This has led to higher costs.

At Straits Construction Singapore, which employs 900 foreign workers, higher dorm charges have contributed to a 10 per cent rise in costs.

Some firms say that they have little choice: They either pay the higher cost or lose a chance to capitalise on a booming economy. Many choose the former route.

Others say they have no choice but to absorb the cost hike because in most cases, they sign 'lump sum contracts' with their clients that can run for between one and four years.

This leaves them with little opportunity to adjust prices when costs go up.

Business costs aside, productivity is another concern.

Mr Benjamin Tan, managing director of Ho Lee Group, which employs around 500 foreign workers, said finding workers' accommodation within a reasonable distance of the workplace is getting harder and harder.

He acknowledged that there is some space in far-flung dorms in Tuas, Woodlands and Lim Chu Kang, but said taking up the space would mean higher transport costs.

The longer travelling time also means productivity will take a hit as more man hours are lost.

Straits Construction director Kenneth Loo agreed, adding that besides lost working hours, workers would have less time to rest if their dorms are situated in out-of-the-way locations.

Checks with several commercial dorm operators and property agents found that the cost of renting a bed space per month for a foreign worker has gone up by between 10 and 20 per cent in the past two years.

It now costs anywhere from $160 to $200 per month, which excludes utility bills in most cases.

Two years ago, the price was between $130 and $160. The waiting time for a vacancy in dorms which are fully occupied can be as long as a year.

Dorm operators attributed the rental hike to increased operating expenses, saying it now costs more to manage facilities. They also have to pay more for services such as waste disposal and general maintenance.

The Singapore Contractors Association, noting concern among its members about the 'increase in prices due to shortage of dormitories and location', said: 'The problem has been slowly resolved, with the Government freeing up more vacant land and unused old buildings to be converted into dormitories over the past two to three years.'

A spokesman added that the association was recently in talks with the authorities to build more dormitories.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Crackdown on illegal dorms in Little India

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 25 August 2010.

Crackdown on illegal dorms in Little India
Rooms let out on sites that are not zoned for hotel use
By Tessa Wong
Straits Times, Aug 25, 2010

Photo caption: These residences operated by DRA in Little India have been told by the Urban Redevelopment Authority to shut down by the middle of next month because those sites have been zoned for commercial use and not for hotel use. DRA's spokesman says the company plans to appeal. At least nine such foreign worker hotels have come up in the past two years. -- ST PHOTO: BRYAN VAN DER BEEK

A NEW type of lodging for foreign workers has sprung up in Little India in recent years, with some offering air-conditioned rooms, cable television and housekeeping services, among other amenities.

But these establishments have come under scrutiny by government agencies, which say that some may not be operating legally and have clamped down on at least two in recent weeks.

At least nine such foreign worker hotels have come up in the past two years. Seven of them are owned by local property company DRA Property Management, spread out over Desker Road, Rowell Road and Dunlop Street.

One is operated by supermarket chain I-Tec above its Jalan Besar retail outlet, while the ninth is operated by the owner of Lamea Restaurant in Desker Road.

They have come up due to demand from foreign workers, particularly those who have not been housed in dorms by their companies, as well as tourists on a tight budget and foreign job seekers looking for a cheap place to stay.

The big attraction is their rates, which can be a fraction of what traditional hotels charge.

Rates range from $7 a night - for a bunk bed in a dorm-like room that can fit up to 30 people - to about $1,200 a month for an air-conditioned room shared by four people.

But it appears that such businesses may be operating on locations that have not been zoned for hotel use and are meant for other purposes, such as commercial or residential activity.

In addition, most of them do not have hotel licences, claiming that they are merely 'residences'. But technically, they meet the Government's definition of a hotel or boarding house, in which case they would need a licence and must operate on a location zoned for hotel use.

This definition, by the Hotel Licensing Board, states that any place with four or more rooms hired out for a fee, and that provides domestic services such as room cleaning, must get a hotel licence.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has already told at least two DRA residences in Rowell Road to shut down by the middle of next month because those sites have been zoned for commercial use and not for hotel use. The DRA spokesman said the company plans to appeal.

Mr Jolovan Wham, spokesman for foreign workers' rights group Home, said that such establishments helped to fill a gap in housing, by providing cheap yet comfortable accommodation.

'Other places can be quite squalid, with no proper management. At least these boarding houses are maintained well, sometimes even with air-conditioning,' he said.

Guests also gave the thumbs-up, saying such establishments provide good service at a low cost.

Mr Dhanam Tennakoon, 74, who is from Sri Lanka, has been sharing a room with two relatives at a DRA residence for the past six months while one of his relatives seeks medical treatment here.

'We like this place. It's very reasonable, and it lets us do our own cooking and washing,' said Mr Tennakoon.

When told that the establishment might be illegal, he shrugged. 'We pay, and we stay. That's all I know.'

But others are less thrilled to see such businesses springing up. The Straits Times understands that the URA has received a number of complaints from the public, alleging that some of them are illegal boarding houses.

A URA spokesman said it is investigating some of these establishments.

Under the Planning Act, a person responsible for unauthorised use of a property may be fined up to $200,000 and/or imprisoned for up to a year. If the offence continues after conviction, a fine of up to $10,000 per day may be imposed.

Owners of unlicensed hotels may also be fined up to $2,000 on the first conviction, under the Hotel Act. For subsequent offences, the person may incur the same fine and/or be sent to prison for up to six months.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Strategy to beat labour crunch

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 24 August 2010.

Strategy to beat labour crunch
Swee Say outlines three-pronged plan
By Kor Kian Beng
Straits Times, Aug 24, 2010

ONE common view is that fewer foreign workers here will reduce competition for jobs and lessen the social impact that their presence causes.

The Government's concern, on the other hand, is that a cutback would cause labour shortages in some industries and slow economic growth.

But labour chief Lim Swee Say believes there is a way to address these contrasting concerns and still have the best of both worlds.

Speaking at a National Day observance ceremony yesterday, he outlined a three-pronged strategy to achieve this.

- Expand the resident workforce by tapping into the pool of Singaporeans and permanent residents, especially those who are older, and reaching out to economically inactive women;

- Boost productivity of the workforce;

- Improve the skills of foreign workers who do come here.

The combination of these three factors can be 'a very powerful tool', he told over 500 union leaders and staff of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC).

Explaining how growing the resident workforce could help, he noted that nearly 76 per cent of the 2.19 million Singapore citizens and permanent residents aged 25 to 64 are currently employed.

Raising the employment rate among this group by just one percentage point would see 22,000 people added to the workforce, he said.

Similarly, if every one in Singapore's workforce of 2.9 million people improved on productivity by a similar one percentage point, their output would be equal to what 29,000 additional workers would have produced, he added.

The combination of having more older individuals and inactive women placed in jobs, and improving productivity, would be akin to having added 51,000 people to the workforce, he said.

'So it's possible to have the best of both worlds by improving employment and productivity so that we can increase gross domestic product and, at the same time, manage the inflow of foreign workers,' said Mr Lim, who is Minister in the Prime Minister's Office.

Nanyang Technological University labour economist Chew Soon Beng said if the strategy that Mr Lim put forward proved successful, there would be no need for difficult trade- offs to be made - such as between having fewer foreign workers and slower growth.

'If we're able to do that, it would see fewer residents being jobless and workers taking home higher wages. Foreign workers would also be brought in to complement locals, not replace them.'

But the realities on the ground were that lower-skilled foreigners would continue to be viewed by some employers as a cheaper source of labour compared to hiring the locals, said Prof Chew.

'Also, productivity improvements won't happen overnight. So it remains to be seen if such a strategy would work.'

Similarly, Barclays Capital economist Leong Wai Ho cited the need to strike a balance between trying to get more out of the workforce and inadvertently creating stress on workers, which could be counter-productive.

Mr Lim, however, said the strategy would achieve another important aim: having a workforce that all types of workers can be part of.

This was one area the NTUC would focus on. It also aims to build a more inclusive union membership to represent all segments of the workforce.

In fact, Mr Lim said that if the NTUC was successful in its membership drive, it could be the world's first labour movement to serve the entire workforce.

'Today in 2010, you cannot find any labour movement in the world where one labour movement is positioned to serve all collars, all ages, all nationalities of workers. None,' he said of its goal.

NTUC aims to have 650,000 members by 2011 and to hit the one million mark by 2015.

The observance ceremony yesterday, organised by the NTUC and the Ong Teng Cheong Labour Leadership Institute, was the last of 26 ceremonies held by unions and companies across Singapore this month to mark National Day.

Monday, August 23, 2010

Maid-to-order bill helps domestic workers

The following article was published in the Bangkok Post on 23 August 2010.

Maid-to-order bill helps domestic workers

Hundreds of thousands of domestic workers are set to gain the same protection enjoyed by workers in official economic sectors.

Pongsak Plengsaeng, an adviser to Labour Minister Paitoon Kaewthong, said the draft of the ministerial regulation on the protection of domestic workers, those who work within their employers' household, was expected to be completed on Sept 23, the ministry's anniversary.

He said it would be sent to the cabinet for consideration and approval this year.

Mr Pongsak said the regulation would lure more people to the domestic industry as they would be protected by the law, and, importantly, the law would be promoted among employers and employees.

He said employees should know about their basic rights and employers must realise what they should avoid.

The minimum wage, day leave, access to medical treatment and education, and other requirements would be specified in the ministerial regulation.

Mr Pongsak's announcement at a seminar yesterday heralding this Saturday's Day of Domestic Workers is being cheered by domestic workers, both Thais and foreigners, and labour rights activists.

The 1998 Labour Protection Act does not cover domestic workers.

Sumeth Riddhagani, head of the House of Representatives' labour committee, said domestic workers were looked on as not contributing much to the country's economy, so policy makers had previously paid them little attention.

Many do not have a day off, holidays, health benefits, education opportunities or any bargaining power with their employers. Some domestic workers also suffer sexual harassment.

Adisorn Kerdmongkol, a member of the human rights activist group Committee of Action Network for Migrants, said there was no exact number of domestic workers in the country.

But based on Kasikorn Research Centre data collected in 2007, there were an estimated 400,000 people working for private households, consisting of 225,000 Thai-nationality domestic workers and 150,000 foreign domestics. The remaining 25,000 were Thai people working in overseas households.

Mr Adisorn applauded the government's action.

When maids moonlight on days off

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 22 August 2010.

When maids moonlight on days off
Some take on an extra job for the extra income; most employers don't mind
By Elizabeth Soh
Straits Times, Aug 22, 2010

Photo caption: At popular hangout Lucky Plaza, some maids set up makeshift stalls offering manicures and pedicures to earn extra income. -- ST PHOTO: NURIA LING

Indonesian maid Ummi, 37, cooks and cleans for a household of seven and gets a day off each week.

Just like most other maids, she heads to City Plaza to buy phone cards or to chat with friends.

But unlike them, she buys up to 20 of such top-up phone cards at one go, and not for herself.

Ummi runs an enterprising business from these cards. By buying them for $20 and reselling them for $26 to the maids in her neighbourhood who do not get days off, she makes a tidy profit of around $240 a month. That is more than half her salary of $400.

Foreign domestic workers are taking up sideline jobs like selling phone cards, giving cheap manicures and dabbling in multi-level marketing to earn extra income.

Over at popular maid hangout Lucky Plaza, a small group of about ten Filipino maids have set up makeshift manicure stands along the walkway to Mount Elizabeth, charging just $5 for a simple buff, shine and polish.

'Just because we're domestic workers does not mean we don't want to dress up and be a bit more glamorous,' said Ms M. Garlejo, 28, who sports well-manicured red nails. 'But obviously we cannot afford to pay $15 at a nail salon.'

She was trained as a nail technician in a salon in Cebu, but gave it up for the better pay of being a maid in Singapore four years ago.

'The extra money I earn is enough to pay for the school fees of my daughter, two nieces, and their textbooks for an entire year,' said Ms Garlejo. 'I am prepared to sacrifice my days off for them.'

It is nearly impossible to tell how many maids moonlight, as most employers are either unaware or choose not to report them.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said it investigated 14 foreign domestic workers in 2008 and nine last year for moonlighting.

But domestic workers' welfare organisations say it is occurring on a large scale.

'I only do this on my day off,' said Ummi, who supports a husband, elderly parents and five children back home in Java, Indonesia.

'I do my job well and I help other maids who cannot go out and are lonely at home, so I don't think it is wrong.'

Having worked in Singapore for the same employer for almost 15 years, Ummi has access to a network of about 10 other maids in the Changi neighbourhood where she lives, and the phone cards are discreetly passed over fences or at the playground.

She has been selling phone cards for about a year and was introduced to the idea by fellow Indonesian maids, whom she met at the mosque she frequents every week.

A check with three second-hand mobile phone shops in City Plaza confirmed that there has been an increase in the number of foreign domestic workers who are buying the phone cards in bulk purchases of up to 30 pieces at a time.

'This extra income is all I have,' said Indonesian maid Tini, 28, who sells five or six cards a week.

'I have to work for the next two years to pay off my employer and agency; this is the only money I can send home.'

Multi-level marketing has also been an alternative source of income for maids with wide networks.

Last year, an employer wrote to The Straits Times Forum page, voicing concern over his maid paying to join a multi-level marketing company. She had paid $300 for health-care products which she then intended to sell to other maids.

'Even if I don't sell it to other maids, maybe the people I meet at the market will be interested,' said Indonesian maid Fatin, 36, who signed up as an agent for a Jakarta- based multi-level marketing company that sells herbal skin treatments.

Sideline jobs run afoul of the laws in place for foreign domestic workers. In April this year, acting on a tip-off, the MOM conducted a raid at the Lucky Plaza five-foot way where maids ply their nail services, and issued warning letters to 12 of them for breaching the conditions of their work permits.

'MOM reminds all foreign domestic workers that they are only allowed to perform domestic chores for their employer and at the residence as stated in their work permits,' said Mr Tan Yong Kiang, assistant director for media, promotions and education, adding that foreign domestic workers with sidelines are liable to be fined up to $5,000 and imprisoned for up to six months.

Mr Desmond Chin, 45, director of Nation maid agency which has six branches islandwide, said all maids are told the conditions of their work permits during their orientation.

'Their focus should be on being a helper and they should not get distracted,' he said.

But most employers The Sunday Times spoke to either do not mind or support their maids' business ventures.

Out of 30 employers interviewed, 18 said they were supportive, five said they did not mind, while seven objected to their maids moonlighting.

'As long as my maid does her main job well, there is no reason why she cannot do what she wants on her day off,' said retired teacher Mary Lim, 54, whose Indonesian maid has worked for her for seven years.

Engineer Ernest Chong, 35, whose maid is the primary caregiver of his two children, agrees.

'They earn so little, what's wrong with them trying to make a little more through honest means?' he said.

Migrant worker advocacy group Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) feels the focus should be on the problems that make domestic workers turn to sideline jobs.

'The low wages of Indonesian and Sri Lankan maids don't measure up to the rising standards of living here. Looking at fair wages should be the concern,' said Ms Shafiyahtun Najak, communications manager at TWC2.

Member of Parliament for Sembawang GRC Lim Wee Kiak felt that while foreign domestic workers should be sympathised with, it is more important to reduce the potential for other problems should sideline jobs be permitted.

'I am afraid by taking a relaxed stance, they may be subjected to abuse and exploitation,' said Dr Lim. 'Employers may now request their domestic help to do other sideline jobs instead of what they are here for.'

Saturday, August 21, 2010

All in aid of Filipino maid welfare

The following editorial was published in the Straits Times on 21 August 2010.

All in aid of Filipino maid welfare
Straits Times, Review, Aug 21, 2010

FILIPINO maids should welcome laws adopted by their government that, in practice and intent, protect their welfare as they seek work abroad. They should have no objection to tighter rules introduced following amendments to migrant workers' legislation last year. A new requirement is an overseas employment certificate which a government agency will issue only when a prospective maid has a standard employment contract verified by another office and authenticated by the Philippine embassy in the country of employ.

Filipinas ought to be reassured that their government is looking out for them and will be in a position to demand accountability when problems arise. They and their employers in Singapore and elsewhere will benefit from the pre-departure training included in the process. Beyond these desirable objectives, however, some uncertainty remains. It is not clear how much the new regulations would add to the bureaucratic cost and who will bear the additional expense. More recruitment time, certainly, is needed. Recruitment takes as long as three weeks, instead of one week previously. The red tape has discouraged at least nine Singapore agents from bringing Filipinas here. Some will turn to other sources.

About 60,000 of the 196,000 foreign maids here are Filipinas. Even if the new requirements affect overall demand only slightly, the decline in remitted earnings could be significant. The verifiable standard contract stipulates a $540 salary and four days off a month. Will higher pay - even if enough employers agree to it - offset the remittance loss? The maid service here has become more open over the years, with supply sources extended to Myanmar and Sri Lanka as well as Indonesia. Filipinas have commanded a premium because of English proficiency, but employers seldom agree to pay more than the market rate of around $370. Some are reluctant to give more than the occasional day off. Most maids, in any case, need only a couple of months to pick up a working knowledge of the language spoken in their employer's household.

To enforce the new rules, the authorities have stepped up departure screening. Those without the right documents have been stopped from leaving, but many will continue to skirt the restrictions by travelling on tourist visas with the intention of working abroad, although the Philippine government considers this illegal. Seven in 10 Filipino maids here do not yet have the requisite documentation. Beyond matters of jurisdiction, the ruling could simply be trumped by the realities of supply and demand.

Victimised migrant workers - Protect, don't punish

The following letter was published in the Straits Times forum on 21 August 2010.

Victimised migrant workers
Protect, don't punish, them
Straits Times, Aug 21, 2010

THE Ministry of Home Affairs, in its reply on Monday ('Wilful breach of border security can't be condoned') may have misinterpreted the crux of the letter from Home, the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics ('Prosecute human traffickers and protect scam victims'; Aug 10).

The point of Home's letter was about a greater need to protect migrant workers who have been victims of scam agents and punish those who deliberately deceive them. Instead, the ministry emphasised the need to protect Singapore's borders about which there is no dispute. Singapore must protect its borders, and this includes thorough investigations to prosecute human traffickers.

However, it is not always the case that humans are smuggled covertly in the boot of cars or in small speedboats.

A critical distinction needs to be made between immigration offenders who may have breached immigration law as a result of the wilful deception of others, and criminals who are a proven threat to the community and national security.

The first situation may arise when migrant workers are coerced or deceived into accepting and paying for jobs overseas, only to realise after their arrival that:

- The jobs don't exist;

- The working conditions are not as promised;

- Their work passes are not legitimate; and

- Their jobs are not legal.

Often in debt after having paid thousands of dollars in recruitment fees, such victims may choose to stay in such situations for fear of further punishment and deportation.

The current tendency towards criminalising all immigration offenders without discrimination results in such workers being punished, despite the fact that it is the scam agents and unethical employers who deceived them who should be fined and jailed.

Authorities tasked with protecting our borders and keeping Singapore safe should also offer protection to those who have been cheated and exploited and currently reside in Singapore, regardless of their immigration status.

With our efficient networks and technological prowess, enhanced coordination between the immigration authorities and the Ministry of Manpower can lead to greater improvements on both fronts.

Stephanie Chok (Ms)

Thursday, August 19, 2010

'A terrible place to live'

The following article was first published in the New Paper and republished by AsiaOne on 18 August 2010.

'A terrible place to live'


THEY were living just above a toilet.

Home for these foreign workers was through a tiny door that they had to access via a shaky ladder. There were no windows.

It was dark,damp and dangerous.

This was the scene which greeted The New Paper at a dormitory at 36, Sungei Kadut Street 1, following an e-mail tip-off on July 19.

Foreign workers' "dormitory" at Sungei Kadut

A dormitory resident climbs up the ladder to his room above the toilet in the container housing at 36, Sungei Kadut Street 1. In one of the biggest raids to date, the authorities found more than 300 foreign workers housed in the dormitory. Some of the living quarters were nothing more than rusty containers in an area where mainly heavy industries are located. This cauldron of filth was packed with Bangladeshi, Chinese and Indian workers employed by different companies and housed in quarters disguised as a dormitory.



A sign claims the site is an approved workers’ dormitory.

‘Dormitories’ at 38 Sungei Kadut Street 2 were hidden behind piles of metal sheets and rods. On 10 August 2010, The New Paper went to the premises with the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and the National Environment Agency (NEA) during a joint inspection. There were unstable makeshift staircases and dangerous construction material strewn around nearby. Workers living there were not prepared to talk.

Workers sleep on triple-deck beds. This was the scene which greeted The New Paper at a dormitory at 36, Sungei Kadut Street 1, following an e-mail tip-off.

Some of the living quarters were nothing more than rusty containers in an area where mainly heavy industries are located.

The workers said they slept on wooden planks that were infested with bugs. Power outage was a frequent occurence.

MOM officers checking work permits in the dormitory.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM), Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and National Environment Agency (NEA) launched a joint raid on Aug 10.

In one of the biggest raids to date, the authorities found more than 300 foreign workers housed in the dormitory.

Some of the living quarters were nothing more than rusty containers in an area where mainly heavy industries are located.

The New Paper first checked out the dormitory on July 20.

This cauldron of filth was packed with Bangladeshi, Chinese and Indian workers employed by different companies and housed in quarters disguised as a dormitory.

An unidentified Bangladeshi was climbing an unstable ladder to get to his room.

He had to crawl through a door about half the height of an average door located above the toilet.

Inside the room which he shared with three others was a space filled with computers, lockers and video cameras.

Behind that was a cramped area with four single beds, three of which were occupied by the Bangladeshi, a Chinese national and an Indian national.

There were no toilet facilities in the "room" - they had to climb down the ladder to go to the toilet.

Most of the workers' quarters in the Sungei Kadut site were cramped and damp.

The workers slept on triple-decker beds lined up close together. They had to walk sideways to get to the back of the room.

They had no mattresses and slept on wooden planks they claimed were filled with bugs.

Despite the lack of ventilation, the workers hung up their laundry to dry there.

The New Paper visited the dormitory twice.

Said Mr Md Aslam Uddin, 30, from Bangladesh: "There are so many men here, but so little space and no windows. It's very hot, dirty and a terrible place to live."

According to MOM, the workers came from 35 companies.

There were about 90 beds in each of the four rooms, which were each about one-third the size of a football field.

There were five rooms in total.

Residents tapped the power points for electrical appliances like fans, which they balanced gingerly on their beds.

Wires dangled over the beds. An electrical outage was a regular event, said the workers.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Harder to hire Filipino maids now

The following article was published in the Straits Times on 18 August 2010.

Harder to hire Filipino maids now
By Melissa Sim
Straits Times, Aug 18, 2010

Supply shrinks as Manila enforces rules for workers going overseas

Reproduced photo caption: Indonesian maids sitting in Swift Arrows Maid agency. A recent tightening of Philippine laws has made it tougher for employers here to hire Filipinas as domestic workers. -- ST PHOTO: WANG HUI FEN

A RECENT tightening of Philippine laws has made it tougher for employers here to hire Filipinas as domestic workers.

Immigration screening has been stepped up, and those bound for jobs here without the proper papers have been stopped from leaving the country.

The amendments to the Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995 is aimed at improving the 'protection and welfare' of Filipino migrant workers, said the Philippine embassy here.

Changes to the law were passed last year, but the rules implementing the law were issued only on July 28, said a Philippine government website.

Manpower agencies in the Philippines said Singapore is not being specifically targeted, but the Philippine authorities want to put a lid on Filipinos leaving for jobs abroad without going through Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) procedures.

The POEA issues a Filipino seeking work overseas an Overseas Employment Certificate, explained Mr Rodolfo Sabulao, the labour attache at the Philippine embassy here.

To get that certificate, the job seeker must have supporting documents, including a standard employment contract verified by the Philippine Overseas Labour Office (POLO) and authenticated by the Philippine embassy or consulate.

POEA also requires these job seekers to be trained, so as to prepare them for their overseas work stints.

Nine Singapore agents who spoke to The Straits Times said they have stopped bringing in Filipinas as domestic workers as it has become too troublesome.

The Straits Times understands that some agents have been getting around the regulations by working with Philippine travel agents to get the women out of their country as tourists first.

That done, the Singapore agents provide the women with an In-Principle Approval (IPA) letter or Letter of Notification from the Manpower Ministry, so that they can enter Singapore legally.

The domestic workers then sign local contracts provided by the Association of Employment Agencies (Singapore), which is recognised by the Manpower Ministry.

Mr Sabulao said: 'As far as the Philippine government is concerned, leaving the Philippines as a tourist, when the intention is to work overseas, is illegal, even if they have an IPA.'

Illegal or not, Filipinos are doing it. Seven in 10 Filipino maids here do not have POEA papers. This is an estimate by Ms Thelma Uanang, who runs Philquest, a POEA-registered Manila-based recruitment agency which sends about 65 maids a month here the legitimate way.

About 196,000 foreigners were here as maids as of last December, with Filipinas remaining popular because they speak English. This is why some agents still bring them in, even if the new rules may mean waiting longer for the maid to arrive - up to three weeks, as opposed to a week back when the rules were more lax.

Employers might also have to pay more: The contract verified by POLO secures for maids a salary of $540 and four days off a month, said Mr Sabulao.

But agents say employers here seldom agree to pay a new Filipino domestic worker more than $350 to $370. Some are also reluctant to give maids days off.

Mr Edmund Pooh of the Universal Employment Agency here said: 'The Philippine government has good intentions, but on the other hand, they're making it difficult for their people to get a job, as most employers won't agree to such terms.'

But the Philippine government is sticking to its guns.

Said Mr Sabulao: 'If workers are deployed and leave as tourists and don't have proper documentation, nobody is held accountable. If they are injured, who will be liable?'

Focus on worker safety

The following AFP story was published in the Straits Times on 18 August 2010.

Focus on worker safety
Aug 18, 2010

SINGAPORE - ALAM Khali can still remember vividly how he feared for his safety whenever he squatted on the back of an open-topped lorry while being ferried to construction sites in Singapore.

Squashed in with other foreign labourers, the 40-year-old Bangladeshi said he clung on to whatever part of the lorry he could get his hands on as the vehicle made its way around the wealthy city-state.

'Of course scared, but boss says take lorry, we take,' Mr Khali, who has been working in Singapore since 2003, shrugged in an interview at a hotel construction site while having a lunch of plain vegetables and white rice. Thanks to a new boss, Mr Khali now gets a stipend to travel by subway to work, but most of the estimated 245,000 foreign construction workers from poorer Asian countries are not so lucky.

Transported around like cattle even under pouring rain, the workers are a daily reminder to Singaporeans of how tough it is to be at the bottom of the economic ladder, but attitudes are changing.

Lee Kitt Anya, an 11-year-old schoolgirl, won a national book-writing competition last year for a story she wrote about a fictional Indian worker after being shocked by the sight of a group of labourers on a lorry. 'It's quite a horrifying sight because it was raining very heavily and they were so wet,' she recalled. 'I felt quite appalled.' Ms Lee donated part of the proceeds from her book to a welfare group for migrant workers called HOME. 'I don't mind and I don't really need the money, they need it more,' she said.

The death of three Chinese workers in road accidents in June has prompted Singapore to accelerate the implementation of new safety rules, including fitting lorries with canopies and higher side railings. 'Singaporeans are generally used to seeing workers transported in this way, but even so, more and more feel that it is wrong,' said John Gee, president of Transient Workers Count 2 (TWC2), a local advocacy group for migrant workers. 'Their sympathy with the workers rises every time there is an accident, or when they find themselves in heavy traffic during a downpour and see workers crouched in the back of a lorry, holding what they can over their heads to offer some protection,' he told AFP. -- AFP

Human trafficking: A plague

The following article was first published in the Business Mirror on 14 August 2010.

Human trafficking: A plague
Written by Estrella Torres / Reporter
Saturday, 14 August 2010

A faded brown rosary hangs on one corner of her bed inside a shelter.

It has been two weeks since 15-year-old Carla (not her real name) was rescued after being forced to work in a brothel in Cavite. “Sabi nila maganda daw sa Maynila, impyerno pala [They said it’s great to be in Manila, but it’s hell].”

Carla was recruited, along with five other girls her age, in a remote village in South Cotabato where she stayed with her aunt. She was promised a salary of P3,000 to work as a salesgirl in a grocery store in Manila but ended up working as a prostitute in Cavite.

Poverty itself dehumanizes. But the pain inflicted on the victims of human trafficking like Carla is unimaginable, searing the very core of their souls, and leaving permanent scars.

Carla believed she could bear the physical pain and humiliation as her male employer turned her into a human “punching bag.” During the morning, she would wake up with kicks and punches from her employer while he shouted invectives at her. She would clean the bar, wash clothes of her employers and do errands while she’s made to eat leftovers of the family.

On her third night, she was asked to put on a skimpy dress and wear makeup. She was then forced to go out with two officers wearing uniforms of the Philippine Navy.

“I thought I could tell them about my situation and ask for help,” said Carla, believing that those men are law enforcers.

“But these men in uniform dragged me near the sea and alternately raped me inside a small boat ….they’re pigs,” Carla said tearfully in Tagalog.

Carla languished for three months inside the brothel until one day, when her employer asked her to go with a woman who needed a baby sitter. But her new employer turned out to be another member of the syndicate and was supposed to bring her to Sabah to work as a prostitute.

Along with two other girls, Carla was about to board a domestic flight in Manila going to Zamboanga—where they were to take a boat to Sabah—when they were intercepted by the police and immigration officers. They were consequently turned over to the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) and are now undergoing psychological rehabilitation through the Visayan Forum.

Part of the statistics

Carla is just one of the hundreds of thousands of victims of human trafficking in the Philippines. She now stays in one of the shelters of the Visayan Forum, where she is able to attend night school.

The United Nations defines human trafficking as “the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability, or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits, to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.”

The Philippines is considered one of the world’s sources and transit places for human trafficking due to its heavy dependence on migrant workers, 8 million of them working abroad.

Around 600,000 to 800,000 people were trafficked worldwide in 2003, according to the 2010 US government report on Trafficking in Persons (TIP), a figure believed to be understated even, owing to so many unreported cases. At least 70 percent of them are women and children forced into prostitution and forced labor.

In the Philippines estimates from the Visayan Forum indicates that around 10,000 reaching up to 100,000 victims are being trafficked every year within the country, as well as sent abroad in large-scale forced labor, slavery and sexual exploitation to destinations like Malaysia, Sudan, Syria, Nigeria, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and even as far as Eastern Europe.

The latter figured prominently two weeks ago when alert immigration officials in Manila stopped 11 Filipino women about to fly to Bangkok as “tourists,” but who did not seem to have any idea about where they would stay, and where they will go. Quizzed by officials, they pointed to a Slovenian recruiter, later arrested, as the one holding their travel documents, and who was supposed to make them take a flight from Bangkok to India, where Slovenian consular officers would give them a visa to work in “hotels” in Eastern Europe.

Cecile Oebanda-Flores, executive director of the Visayan Forum, said traffickers thrive in the multibillion-dollar global operation through underground networks with strong links with corrupt public officials and transport operators.

She said syndicates clandestinely move victims of the modern-day slavery in connivance with corrupt public officials and transport operators in different ports and land routes in the Philippines.

“Internal trafficking is the springboard for international trafficking. Worldwide recruitment relies on intricate processes that start in far-flung communities,” Oebanda-Flores said. “Every year, thousands of Filipino women and children are trapped through the cycle of trafficking into a life of slavery, sexual exploitation and human-rights violations.”

Extreme poverty, conflict and seeming hopelessness drive people like Carla, who hailed from a strife-torn Cotabato village, and was lured by the false promises of a better life in Manila.

In 2009 the International Labor Organization (ILO) estimated around 12.3 million victims of forced labor and other forms of bondage. In its global report titled, “The Cost of Coercion,” the ILO estimated that victims of forced labor lose an estimated $20 billion every year in unpaid earnings.

ILO also lamented the fact that global economies continue to import and export
billions of dollars worth of products “tainted” by forced labor in manufacturing and raw materials procurement.

Many countries, according to the ILO, also “knowingly and unknowingly” deport victims of human trafficking without giving them shelter and reintegration services. The ILO also argued that these economies continue to thrive amid the vulnerability of migrant populations, particularly people who have been trafficked.

The governments of many developed nations like the United States, European capitals like France, the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy, rich Asian hubs like Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaysia, Arab financial centers like Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait have adopted tougher measures to rid their borders of unwanted foreign workers, particularly victims of trafficking.

However, many of their citizens and industries have in past years been taking advantage of the vulnerability of the victims of human trafficking because they see these people as desperate to land jobs and will not dare complain to authorities even in the face of harassment, intimidation and abuses.

Most of the victims and their families who fall prey to these syndicates also face difficulty getting out of bondage as they become heavily indebted to friends and the recruiters.

Maid in Singapore

At 24, Trina (not her real name) thought the job being offered to her in Singapore would ease the burden of her poor family in Alaminos, Pangasinan. A friend told her someone is recruiting people to work as household-service workers in Singapore.

A week after she grabbed an offer to be a domestic helper in Singapore, Trina received a call from the recruiter asking for P13,500 to buy her tickets and process her employment.

She was given only two weeks to raise the money and was forced to borrow from her mother’s friend. Trina went to Manila to process her work documents, including her passport and medical certificate, and take the examination.

Trina never saw the female recruiter who regularly calls her to ask for money and merely tells her where to go and what do.

Two weeks after she finished her work documents, she was asked to go to a fast-food store beside Baclaran Church to take the examination for employment. She was joined by five other female recruits.

The recruiter called her up after a week and asked her to go back to the fast-food store near the Baclaran church. Someone handed her the plane tickets to Singapore and some travel documents. They were asked to pay anotherP2,600 each for the airport tax and other “expenses” going to the airport.

Unknown to Trina and the five girls bound for Singapore, an immigration officer at the airport is already alerted on their flight schedule to allow them pass through the routine checks smoothly.

“Basta sa Window 7 lang daw po kami pipila pagdating sa [we were just instructed to line up only at Window 7 when we reach] immigration,” said Trina.

The girls were also reminded not to talk with each other during their travel so the authorities will not suspect them of being trafficked.

Trina’s memory of the dates from the time the recruiter called her up until she arrived in Singapore was very precise. The way she remembers the dates appears very academic and she pours them out in rote, but not until she begins telling about her ordeal.

As she began to relive her ordeal in Singapore, she pulled out a small orange checkered handkerchief and started to twist, fold and unfold it during the interview. Unaware of it, Trina was showing anger, frustration and pain from the way she mangled her handkerchief.

Upon arrival in Singapore, they were all led to a house of a Chinese national where they were tasked to clean the two-story building for four consecutive days. They did not receive any pay from cleaning the house and doing all the chores for the Chinese national.

On her fifth day there, Trina was brought to her employer, a Singaporean couple and their six-year-old son. “It was only during my first day that they were kind to me,” said Trina.

Trina made a mistake in fixing the kitchen and her female employer started to shout at her while kicking her all over her body. At times, her male employer would hit her head with hardbound books that would really make her feel dizzy and left with bruises.

Her employers allowed her to sleep only at 1 a.m. and would wake her up at 5 a.m. to help their child get ready for school.

“The child is also cruel. After I take him to the shower, he would spit on my face and push the toothpaste cap in my eyes while I help him dress up,” recalled Trina in Filipino.

Trina was never allowed to eat any decent meal. “I always eat their leftovers. Most of the time, they would put toothpick and used table napkins on those leftovers before they give them to me.”

She was not allowed to stay inside the comfort room for more than five minutes, forcing “open the door [to] drag me out.”

Their cruelty seemed to have a numbing effect on Trina. While trying to accept her miserable condition, she would always think that her salary would somehow repay the abuses that she suffered.

But she was wrong. In the last three months, she did not receive a single cent from her employer. Trina was supposed to earn S$340 a month. She agreed to get only S$10 as allowance to buy her personal stuff. The entire amount was to be paid to her recruiter, to whom she “owed” a total of S$2,500.

Her employers did not give her even the monthly S$10 as allowance.

She talked to her recruiter and begged that she be transferred to another employer as she could no longer bear the cruelty of her masters. But the recruiter merely warned her she will be deported if she fails to complete payment of her debts.

“I haven’t even sent any amount to my family back home. We’re so burdened by debts. I would rather bear the cruelty of my employers here than die of hunger with my family back home,” she recalled telling herself.

But the physical abuses of her employers continued, prompting Trina to beg her female employer to help her find another employer.

To her surprise, she was allowed to go. Her female employer even agreed to accompany her to another employer.

“I grabbed all my bags immediately without checking their contents. Instead of taking me to another employer, I was brought to the immigration office where my boss asked the officers to check on my bags.” The officers found a S$50 bill in her bag and she was very certain her female employer placed the money there to find an excuse to have her jailed.

Trina was made to sign a confession letter where she admitted to stealing money from her employer. The immigration officer brought her to the police and she was later detained at the Changi Prison for female offenders.

She was sentenced to four weeks’ imprisonment. Her notorious recruiter even made up another crooked means to further bleed Trina’s family of their scarce resources.

Trina’s mother received a call from the recruiter telling her to send P30,000 to bail out her daughter who was in jail for stealing money.

The family had difficulty raising the money then but the recruiter kept calling up Trina’s mother, this time lowering the supposed amount for bail to P15,000.

Trina’s brother, meanwhile, sensed that his family was being fooled all along and searched for the contact number of a nongovernment organization (NGO) in Singapore which was referred to him by a friend.

Trina’s stay at the Changi prison for women was shortened to one week because of the good behavior she showed. The NGO was able to locate Trina inside the jail and processed her immediate repatriation.

Culture of deception

Human trafficking thrives in a culture of deception. The members of syndicates of this global menace are well-entranched and are successful in societies where poverty, despair and inequality are heavily felt among people.

The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) has issued a deployment ban on certain countries facing war and conflict such as Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as in countries with unstable governments like Nigeria and Somalia.

DFA executive director for migrant workers affairs Enrico Foz said the workers are barred from countries such as Lebanon, Syria and Jordan “based on the apparent absence of protection for foreign migrants.”

However, such measure did not prevent the trafficking of workers for these countries as the number of undocumented Filipino workers even swelled.

Director Foz said the deployment ban on Syria for household-service workers arose from rampant complaints from Filipinos that they are overworked, suffering from physical abuse, harassment, sexual abuse as well as unpaid salaries.

The Commission on Filipinos Overseas (CFO) said there were at least 19,423 Filipino workers in Syria in 2008. Of this figure, only 135 are permanently employed while 13,288 work as temporary workers, mostly domestic help. There are also 6,000 undocumented Filipinos in Syria, who are apparently victims of trafficking.

DFA statistics showed there are 31,000 Filipino workers in Jordan, mostly household-service workers. Of this figure, 16,000 of them were trafficked Filipinas who managed to get into Jordan despite employment restrictions.

Kuwait is also one of the top destinations for victims of human trafficking, mostly female.

Director Foz said of the 145,550 Filipino workers in Kuwait, only 550 are permanently deployed. More than 10,000 of them are trafficked Filipino workers and the rest are skilled and semiskilled workers, as well as female household-service workers.

Female household workers are the most prone to physical and sexual abuse from employers in these Middle East countries but the situation can get worse if they are trafficked people because they have no legal protection from the host governments.

The abuses of Arab employers are often unreported because the victims of trafficking are afraid to complain to authorities, as they could either end up in jail for lacking work permits, or they would no longer get their salaries.

The death of 34-year-old Filipina maid Asria Samad Abdul who was tortured to death by her employer in Kuwait sent chills down the spine of veteran diplomats like Foz who has been exposed to cases of abuses against Filipino workers.

Foz couldn’t hide his anger and frustration over the case of Asria as he confirmed that Asria’s employers, an Egyptian couple, brought her to the Kabd desert area and crushed her body under their vehicle to give an impression that she was run over by a motorist.

The Kuwaiti police found the remains of Asria on July 17. The poor Filipino worker entered Kuwait legally but her suffering is far more brutal compared with the situation of undocumented workers.

Foz said the DFA, through the embassy in Kuwait, has hired private lawyers to prosecute the Egyptian couple who are now held in jail.

“We will prosecute for the intention of really convicting people behind these dastardly acts committed against our nationals,” said Foz.

The Philippines is the third-largest source of migrant workers with more than 8 million of them deployed across the globe, next to China and India.

But considering the fraction of migrant workers coming from China and India, which could not be even 5 percent of their population, the Philippines is considered the top sending country of migrant workers because 10 percent of its people are sent for work abroad. However, a huge number of them, a total of 653,609 Filipino workers are undocumented, according to the CFO statistics as of 2008.

Two Asian capitals, Malaysia and Singapore, are host to the biggest bulk of undocumented Filipino migrant workers.

CFO statistics showed that of the 243,683 Filipino workers in Malaysia, 128,000 are undocumented and only 89,681 are temporary and the rest are permanent workers.

At the same time, of the 158,231 Filipino workers in Singapore, 56,000 are undocumented while 66,411 and 35,820 are temporary and permanent workers, respectively.

Rich European capitals like France have the biggest number of undocumented migrant workers with 39,000 of the total 47,170; Italy is host to 117,090 Filipino workers, with 13,000 of them undocumented.

Greece is host to 38,600 Filipino workers and 6,000 of them are undocumented, while 32,504 are temporary workers, mostly household-service workers. Spain has 50,680 Filipino workers and 4,055 of them are undocumented; Cyprus has more than 18,000 Filipino workers and 3,000 are undocumented.



Lopsided equation

Human trafficking as a critical global menace has indeed become profitable to underground businesses worldwide, similar to trafficking in money, drugs and guns.

Former Labor undersecretary Susan Ople said traffickers earn P5,000 for each person sent to forced labor, sexual slavery and other forms of bondage. “If the trafficker is sending a girl who is still a virgin, the going rate could be as high as P26,000 per head.”

Rich countries undeniably benefit from human trafficking as their industries and citizens take advantage of the vulnerability of the victims of migrant workers, either as source of cheap labor or poorly paid household-service workers.

Likewise, sending more than 8 million Filipino workers abroad has become profitable to the Philippine economy because of their record-high remittances that reached nearly $18 billion in 2009.

But a closer look at the Philippine social structure shows majority of families of Filipino migrant workers continue to languish in poverty, hopelessness and despair.

OFW families remain poor

The Episcopal Commission for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant People, a panel of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines, said in a study that at least 60 percent of the families of the 8 million OFWs remain poor.

Fr. Edwin Corros, executive secretary of the Church-backed group, explained that majority of the migrant workers from the Philippines are classified as unskilled and semiskilled like the household-service workers who usually come home empty-handed.

Like Trina, these hundreds of thousands of migrant workers abroad were promised a good-paying job but ended up in the hands of abusive employers. Worse, her dream of a better life for her family has been shattered, their future saddled by huge debts used in preparing for her deployment abroad, and as a result of the nonpayment of their salaries.

The lingering poverty, as well as despair and lack of trust in the government, keeps pushing people in the countryside, especially conflict-stricken parts of Mindanao, to fall prey into the hands of human traffickers.

Hunger and despair push people to desperate situations. The cases of Trina and Carla are magnified in at least 161 countries where human trafficking continues to thrive. Most of the victims are children and women.

Rich economies continue to struggle to impose tough measures on undocumented immigrants to rid their governments of the heavy social and health burdens as well as security nightmares.

However, these measures should not just be tough on the victims who end up jailed or deported. Instead, governments should strengthen efforts in combating the global menace by plugging the leaks in the systems.

Human trafficking, experts said, will not thrive in a society that does not allow operations of brothels, sweat shops and factories that mostly hire minors and women. Also, the governments should implement stiffer rules for their nationals hiring foreign migrant workers in order to ensure that the latter receive fair salary and treatment.

The Philippines has remained in the Tier 2 watchlist of the 2010 US report on Trafficking in Persons owing to the alleged weaknesses in the justice system that make it difficult to punish the perpetrators of this crime.

The passage of the Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 or Republic Act 9208 has led to the creation of the Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking (IACAT)--composed of government agencies to implement preventive, protective and rehabilitative programs to address human trafficking.

The Visayan Forum said that in 2009, there were 228 referred trafficking cases to the Department of Justice but only 206 of them are subject of current investigations. Philippine courts have over 380 pending or ongoing trafficking cases.

So far, there were only 18 convictions since the passing of the antitrafficking law in 2003.

But the number seems unfair, considering the hundreds of thousands of lives destroyed and their dreams shattered.

The physical marks of the injuries of Trina and Carla may have healed over time. But there are unseen bruises that cut deeply into the soul of people traumatized by unimaginable abuses and these wounds can only be healed when justice is finally served.